American Marine Insurance Group v. Neptunia Insurance Company
This text of 961 F.2d 372 (American Marine Insurance Group v. Neptunia Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
961 F.2d 372
AMERICAN MARINE INSURANCE GROUP, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NEPTUNIA INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 1318, Docket 91-9306.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued April 7, 1992.
Decided April 9, 1992.
Appeal from a decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Peter K. Leisure, Judge.
Harry A. Gavalas, New York City (William M. Cassarini, Chalos, English & Brown, of counsel) for plaintiff-appellant.
Thomas S. Howard, Hackensack, N.J. (Holly B. Tashjian, Kirsch, Gartenberg & Howard, of counsel) for defendant-appellee.
Before: FEINBERG, WINTER, and ALTIMARI, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm for substantially the reasons set forth in the Opinion and Order of the District Court in American Marine Insurance Group v. Neptunia Insurance Co., 775 F.Supp. 703 (S.D.N.Y.1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
961 F.2d 372, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-marine-insurance-group-v-neptunia-insurance-company-ca2-1992.