American Marazzi Tile, Inc. v. European Ceramic Tile Center, Inc.

136 A.D.2d 968, 525 N.Y.S.2d 164, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1386

This text of 136 A.D.2d 968 (American Marazzi Tile, Inc. v. European Ceramic Tile Center, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Marazzi Tile, Inc. v. European Ceramic Tile Center, Inc., 136 A.D.2d 968, 525 N.Y.S.2d 164, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1386 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiff, in accordance with the following memorandum:

Special Term should not have granted summary judgment on plaintiff’s third cause of action for counsel fees because the moving papers set forth no facts supporting the value of the legal services incurred. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 A.D.2d 968, 525 N.Y.S.2d 164, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-marazzi-tile-inc-v-european-ceramic-tile-center-inc-nyappdiv-1988.