American Marazzi Tile, Inc. v. European Ceramic Tile Center, Inc.
136 A.D.2d 968, 525 N.Y.S.2d 164, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1386
Opinion
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiff, in accordance with the following memorandum:
Special Term should not have granted summary judgment on plaintiff’s third cause of action for counsel fees because the moving papers set forth no facts supporting the value of the legal services incurred. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
American Marazzi Tile, Inc. v. European Ceramic Tile Center, Inc., 136 A.D.2d 968, 525 N.Y.S.2d 164, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1386 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).
136 A.D.2d 968 (American Marazzi Tile, Inc. v. European Ceramic Tile Center, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.