American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. V & A Ironworks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. V & A Ironworks

302 A.D.2d 414, 754 N.Y.S.2d 575

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 10, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 302 A.D.2d 414 (American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. V & A Ironworks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. V & A Ironworks, 302 A.D.2d 414, 754 N.Y.S.2d 575 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence, gross negligence, breach of contract, and breach of implied warranty, the defendants, Bristol-Halsey, Inc., and V & A Ironworks, separately appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), entered January 11, 2002, as denied their respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellants’ respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. The appellants failed to submit sufficient evidence to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557; Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review. Ritter, J.P., Altman, S. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence, gross negligence, breach of contract, and breach of implied warranty, the defendants, Bristol-Halsey, Inc., and V & A Ironworks, separately appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), entered January 11, 2002, as denied their respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellants’ respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. The appellants failed to submit sufficient evidence to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557; Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review. Ritter, J.P., Altman, S. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 A.D.2d 414, 754 N.Y.S.2d 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-manufacturers-mutual-insurance-v-v-a-ironworks-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack