American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. Ataka & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. Ataka & Co.

32 A.D.2d 627, 299 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3981

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 627 (American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. Ataka & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. Ataka & Co., 32 A.D.2d 627, 299 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3981 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered December 16,1968, granting respondents leave to intervene and to be added as parties defendant in this action for a declaratory judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $30 costs and disbursements to appellants, and the motion denied. Under the common law, the New York statutory law and by virtue of the terms of the policy of Excess Marine Protection & Indemnity insurance covering the S. S. San Patrick, the respondent cargo claimants have no standing to sue or to intervene in the action by the plaintiff-appellant insurer. (Jackson v. Citizens Cas. Co., 277 N. Y. 385, 389; Insurance Law, § 167, subd. 4; § 112, subd. 2, par. [c], cl. [2]; § 46, subd. 21; Meridian Trading Corp. v. National Auto & Cas. Ins. Co., 45 Misc 2d 847.) Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., Tilzer, McGivern, Markewich and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered December 16,1968, granting respondents leave to intervene and to be added as parties defendant in this action for a declaratory judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $30 costs and disbursements to appellants, and the motion denied. Under the common law, the New York statutory law and by virtue of the terms of the policy of Excess Marine Protection & Indemnity insurance covering the S. S. San Patrick, the respondent cargo claimants have no standing to sue or to intervene in the action by the plaintiff-appellant insurer. (Jackson v. Citizens Cas. Co., 277 N. Y. 385, 389; Insurance Law, § 167, subd. 4; § 112, subd. 2, par. [c], cl. [2]; § 46, subd. 21; Meridian Trading Corp. v. National Auto & Cas. Ins. Co., 45 Misc 2d 847.) Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., Tilzer, McGivern, Markewich and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 627, 299 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-manufacturers-mutual-insurance-v-ataka-co-nyappdiv-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack