American Legion Leo Brinda Post No. 90 v. Nebraska Liquor Control Commission

259 N.W.2d 36, 199 Neb. 429, 1977 Neb. LEXIS 825
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 9, 1977
Docket41662
StatusPublished
Cited by35 cases

This text of 259 N.W.2d 36 (American Legion Leo Brinda Post No. 90 v. Nebraska Liquor Control Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Legion Leo Brinda Post No. 90 v. Nebraska Liquor Control Commission, 259 N.W.2d 36, 199 Neb. 429, 1977 Neb. LEXIS 825 (Neb. 1977).

Opinion

Spencer, J.

This case comes on for consideration on a motion of appellees to dismiss for failure of the appellant, Nebraska Liquor Control Commission, to deposit the docket fee with the clerk of the District Court within the time limited by section 25-1912, R. R. S. 1943. We sustain the motion to dismiss.

On July 21, 1977, the District Court for Cherry County entered an order overruling the motion of appellant for a new trial. On August 2, 1977, appellant filed a notice of appeal. The docket fee, however, was not filed with the clerk of the District Court until August 31, 1977, or more than 1 month after the overruling of the motion for a new trial.

Section 25-1912, R. R. S. 1943, provides, so far as material herein: “The proceedings to obtain a reversal, vacation or modification of judgments and decrees rendered or final orders made by the district court, * * * shall be by filing in the office of the clerk of the district court in which such judgment, decree or final order was rendered, within one month after the rendition of such judgment or decree, or the making of such final order, or within one month from the overruling of a motion for a new trial in said cause, a notice of intention to prosecute such appeal * * * and * * * by depositing with the clerk of the district court the docket fee required by law in appeals to the Supreme Court.’’

In Barney v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irr. Dist., 144 Neb. 230, 13 N. W. 2d 120 (1944), we held the Legislature intended that the filing of the notice *431 of appeal and the depositing of the docket fee “in the office of the clerk of the district court” are both mandatory and jurisdictional.

This holding has been reiterated in substance on many occasions since that time. In Radil v. State, 182 Neb. 291, 154 N. W. 2d 466 (1967), we held: “The right to appeal is statutory and the requirements of the statute are mandatory and must be complied with before the appellate court acquires jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action.”

The Radii case and all the more recent cases considered by this court have involved a notice of appeal, and not the deposit of the docket fee. However, as we held in Barney v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irr. Dist., 144 Neb. 230, 13 N. W. 2d 120 (1944), section 25-1912, R. R. S. 1943, makes the filing of the notice of appeal and the payment of the docket fee within 1 month mandatory. The Supreme Court has no power to exercise appellate jurisdiction in proceedings to review the judgment of the District Court in civil cases unless the appellant shall have filed a notice of appeal and deposited a docket fee in the office of the clerk of the District Court within the time fixed and as provided in section 25-1912, R. R. S. 1943.

The motion to dismiss the appeal herein is sustained, and the appeal is dismissed.

Motion to dismiss appeal

SUSTAINED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Blake
310 Neb. 769 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2022)
Robertson v. Rose
704 N.W.2d 227 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2005)
State v. Parmar
586 N.W.2d 279 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1998)
State v. Haase
530 N.W.2d 617 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1995)
In Re Interest of NLB
450 N.W.2d 676 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1990)
In Re Interest of KDB
445 N.W.2d 620 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Dickinson
345 N.W.2d 8 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1984)
Prowswood, Inc. v. Mountain Fuel Supply Co.
676 P.2d 952 (Utah Supreme Court, 1984)
(1971)
60 Op. Att'y Gen. 85 (Wisconsin Attorney General Reports, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 N.W.2d 36, 199 Neb. 429, 1977 Neb. LEXIS 825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-legion-leo-brinda-post-no-90-v-nebraska-liquor-control-neb-1977.