American Investigations, Inc. v. Office of the Attorney General

West Virginia Court of Claims

American Investigations, Inc. v. Office of the Attorney General

21 Ct. Cl. 130

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedDecember 2, 1996

DocketCC-96-538

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ct. Cl. 130 (American Investigations, Inc. v. Office of the Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Investigations, Inc. v. Office of the Attorney General, 21 Ct. Cl. 130 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for a decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent’s Answer.

The claimant seeks payment of $73.35;for. serving a summons on behalf of the respondent. In support of its claim, the claimant submitted an invoice for the service with its Notice of Claim. In its Answer, the respondent admits the validity of the claim in the amount of $69.20, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal year with which this amount could have been paid. The difference between the amount claimed and the amount admitted represents sales tax which should not have been added to the cost of the service. Subsequently, the claimant contacted the Court and indicated it would accept $69.20 as satisfaction for the claim. [131]*131In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award to the claimant in the amount of $69.20.

Award of $69.20.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for a decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent’s Answer.

The claimant seeks payment of $73.35;for. serving a summons on behalf of the respondent. In support of its claim, the claimant submitted an invoice for the service with its Notice of Claim. In its Answer, the respondent admits the validity of the claim in the amount of $69.20, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal year with which this amount could have been paid. The difference between the amount claimed and the amount admitted represents sales tax which should not have been added to the cost of the service. Subsequently, the claimant contacted the Court and indicated it would accept $69.20 as satisfaction for the claim. [131]*131In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award to the claimant in the amount of $69.20.

Award of $69.20.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Ct. Cl. 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-investigations-inc-v-office-of-the-attorney-general-wvctcl-1996.