American International-Royal Travel Services, Inc. v. Hargrove
This text of 510 So. 2d 268 (American International-Royal Travel Services, Inc. v. Hargrove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal of an order granting the defendant’s motion pursuant to Rule 60(b), Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, to set aside the default judgment entered against him.
It is well established that the granting of a Rule 60(b) motion, such as we have in this instance, is generally interlocutory and not appealable. Ex parte Short, 434 So.2d 728 (Ala.1983); Fisher v. Bush, 377 So.2d 968 (Ala.1979); Hobbs v. Hobbs, 423 So.2d 878 (Ala.Civ.App.1982). Cf. Hocutt v. Hocutt, 491 So.2d 247 (Ala.Civ.App.1986).
Accordingly, we have no choice but to dismiss the present appeal. We point out to the plaintiff that review of the granting of the Rule 60(b) motion, if appropriate, may be obtained on an appeal of the final judgment in this case. See Nolan v. Nolan, 429 So.2d 596 (Ala.Civ.App.1982); Hobbs, 423 So.2d 878.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
510 So. 2d 268, 1987 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-international-royal-travel-services-inc-v-hargrove-alacivapp-1987.