American Ins. Co. v. Newberry

Supreme Court of Alabama

American Ins. Co. v. Newberry

100 So. 922, 211 Ala. 699

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedMay 29, 1924

Docket3 Div. 666.

StatusPublished

This text of 100 So. 922 (American Ins. Co. v. Newberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Ins. Co. v. Newberry, 100 So. 922, 211 Ala. 699 (Ala. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

All justices concur in the conclusion that the trial court properly refused the general charge requested by the defendant. A majority of the court, however, composed of SAYRE, GARDNER, MILLER, and BOUL-DIN, JJ., hold that the trial court erred in not granting the plaintiff a new trial because the verdict was contrary to the great weight of the evidence, and the judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause is remanded. Reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

All justices concur in the conclusion that the trial court properly refused the general charge requested by the defendant. A majority of the court, however, composed of SAYRE, GARDNER, MILLER, and BOUL-DIN, JJ., hold that the trial court erred in not granting the plaintiff a new trial because the verdict was contrary to the great weight of the evidence, and the judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause is remanded. Reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 So. 922, 211 Ala. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-ins-co-v-newberry-ala-1924.