American Home Assurance Co. v. National Casualty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

American Home Assurance Co. v. National Casualty Co.

227 A.D.2d 160, 642 N.Y.S.2d 506, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4849

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 7, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 227 A.D.2d 160 (American Home Assurance Co. v. National Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Home Assurance Co. v. National Casualty Co., 227 A.D.2d 160, 642 N.Y.S.2d 506, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4849 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.), entered on or about January 26, 1995, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed plaintiff’s complaint on the grounds of collateral estoppel, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, defendant’s motion for summary judgment denied and plaintiff’s complaint reinstated.

We reverse for the reasons stated in American Home Assur. Co. v International Ins. Co. (219 AD2d 143). Both cases arise out of the same underlying event, the issues raised on appeal are identical, and the respective parties are identically situated. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Wallach, Ross and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.), entered on or about January 26, 1995, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed plaintiff’s complaint on the grounds of collateral estoppel, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, defendant’s motion for summary judgment denied and plaintiff’s complaint reinstated.

We reverse for the reasons stated in American Home Assur. Co. v International Ins. Co. (219 AD2d 143). Both cases arise out of the same underlying event, the issues raised on appeal are identical, and the respective parties are identically situated. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Wallach, Ross and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 A.D.2d 160, 642 N.Y.S.2d 506, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-home-assurance-co-v-national-casualty-co-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack