American Home Assurance Co. v. Axium Entertainment Services, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

American Home Assurance Co. v. Axium Entertainment Services, Inc.

306 A.D.2d 93, 762 N.Y.S.2d 45, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6442

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 306 A.D.2d 93 (American Home Assurance Co. v. Axium Entertainment Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Home Assurance Co. v. Axium Entertainment Services, Inc., 306 A.D.2d 93, 762 N.Y.S.2d 45, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6442 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered February 3, 2003, which denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff American Home Assurance Co. brought two actions in California to recover insurance premiums from defendants, but both were voluntarily discontinued by American Home without an adjudication on the merits. It has now brought a third action to recover the premiums in New York. Contrary to defendants’ contentions, the action is not barred by CPLR 3217 (c). It is clear that the latter of the two predicate discontinuances required under that statute must have occurred in New York if such latter discontinuance is to be viewed, pursuant to the statute, as tantamount to an adjudication on the merits. Here, as noted, the latter of the discontinuances cited by defendants did not occur in New York.

Contrary to defendants’ arguments, we find no basis to estop plaintiff from relying on CPLR 202, pursuant to which its action is governed by New York, rather than California, statutory periods and is thus timely. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Andrias and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered February 3, 2003, which denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff American Home Assurance Co. brought two actions in California to recover insurance premiums from defendants, but both were voluntarily discontinued by American Home without an adjudication on the merits. It has now brought a third action to recover the premiums in New York. Contrary to defendants’ contentions, the action is not barred by CPLR 3217 (c). It is clear that the latter of the two predicate discontinuances required under that statute must have occurred in New York if such latter discontinuance is to be viewed, pursuant to the statute, as tantamount to an adjudication on the merits. Here, as noted, the latter of the discontinuances cited by defendants did not occur in New York.

Contrary to defendants’ arguments, we find no basis to estop plaintiff from relying on CPLR 202, pursuant to which its action is governed by New York, rather than California, statutory periods and is thus timely. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Andrias and Lerner, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 A.D.2d 93, 762 N.Y.S.2d 45, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-home-assurance-co-v-axium-entertainment-services-inc-nyappdiv-2003.