American Hoechst Corporation v. Norberg
This text of 449 A.2d 135 (American Hoechst Corporation v. Norberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Certiorari was previously denied in this case due to petitioner’s failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 13(a). Since that denial, petitioner has filed an appropriate memorandum in compliance with the rule and asks that we reconsider the petition. Pursuant to this motion, we have reviewed the petition for certiorari and the supporting memorandum, as well as the response thereto, and, after careful consideration of the arguments made by both parties, we are of the opinion that review is not warranted in this case.
Accordingly, the petition for writ of cer-tiorari is hereby denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
449 A.2d 135, 1982 R.I. LEXIS 1038, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-hoechst-corporation-v-norberg-ri-1982.