American Hoechst Corporation v. Norberg

449 A.2d 135, 1982 R.I. LEXIS 1038
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided May 13, 1982·No. No. 81-554-M.P.·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Certiorari was previously denied in this case due to petitioner’s failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 13(a). Since that denial, petitioner has filed an appropriate memorandum in compliance with the rule and asks that we reconsider the petition. Pursuant to this motion, we have reviewed the petition for certiorari and the supporting memorandum, as well as the response thereto, and, after careful consideration of the arguments made by both parties, we are of the opinion that review is not warranted in this case.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of cer-tiorari is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Hoechst Corporation v. Norberg, 449 A.2d 135, 1982 R.I. LEXIS 1038 (R.I. 1982).

449 A.2d 135 (American Hoechst Corporation v. Norberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.