American Hardware Mut. Ins. Co. v. MULLER

246 A.2d 493, 103 N.J. Super. 9
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedSeptember 24, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 246 A.2d 493 (American Hardware Mut. Ins. Co. v. MULLER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Hardware Mut. Ins. Co. v. MULLER, 246 A.2d 493, 103 N.J. Super. 9 (N.J. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

103 N.J. Super. 9 (1968)
246 A.2d 493

AMERICAN HARDWARE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ERNEST MULLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND d/b/a ERNIE'S AUTO SALES; DAVID S. MULLER AND DONNA LEE MULLER, DEFENDANTS, AND CARL G. LADD, A MINOR BY WILLIAM T. LADD, HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, AND WILLIAM T. LADD, IN HIS OWN RIGHT, INTERVENORS, CROSS-CLAIMANTS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
DONNA LEE MULLER AND AMERICAN HARDWARE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 16, 1968.
Decided September 24, 1968.

Before Judges GAULKIN, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.

Mr. William S. Zink argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Bleakly, Stockwell, Zink & McGeary, attorneys).

Mr. Robert E. Bailey argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs. Halpin & Bailey, attorneys).

Mr. George A. Streitz argued the cause for the intervenors, cross-claimants-respondents.

*10 PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff American Hardware Mutual Insurance Company sought a declaratory judgment exonerating it from liability under a garage liability policy issued by it to defendant Ernest Muller, individually and doing business as Ernie's Auto Sales. The facts are fully set forth in the opinion of the Chancery Division reported in 98 N.J. Super. 11-9.

We affirm the judgment substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Wick.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Denby-Peterson
576 B.R. 66 (D. New Jersey, 2017)
Dziuba v. Fletcher
887 A.2d 732 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2005)
Verriest v. Ina Underwriters Insurance
662 A.2d 967 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1995)
Yonadi v. Commissioner
21 F.3d 1292 (Third Circuit, 1994)
Dobrolowski v. RC Chevrolet, Inc.
547 A.2d 735 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1988)
Martin v. Nager
469 A.2d 519 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1983)
State v. One (1) Ford Van Econoline
381 A.2d 387 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
Friedman v. Royal Globe Ins. Cos.
348 A.2d 546 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)
Crescent Invest. Co. v. Comm. of Bank & Ins.
246 A.2d 493 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.2d 493, 103 N.J. Super. 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-hardware-mut-ins-co-v-muller-njsuperctappdiv-1968.