American Hair & Felt Co. v. Starring
2 A.2d 249, 21 Del. Ch. 431
Opinion
The record and briefs have been carefully considered. The preliminary injunction prayed for by the complainant was properly issued, and the opinion of the Chancellor sufficiently discloses the reasons therefor. The decree is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
American Hair & Felt Co. v. Starring, 2 A.2d 249, 21 Del. Ch. 431 (Del. 1937).
2 A.2d 249 (American Hair & Felt Co. v. Starring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tamer Hassanein v. NTO Fund I
Court of Chancery of Delaware, 2026
The Frederick Hsu Living Trust v. ODN Holding Corporation
Court of Chancery of Delaware, 2017
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sterling Precision Corporation, and the Equity Corporation
393 F.2d 214 (Second Circuit, 1968)
Martin v. American Potash & Chemical Corp.
92 A.2d 295 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1952)
In re Louisville Gas & Electric Co.
77 F. Supp. 176 (D. Delaware, 1948)
Goldman v. Postal Telegraph, Inc.
52 F. Supp. 763 (D. Delaware, 1943)
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co.
24 A.2d 315 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1942)
Greene v. E.H. Rollins Sons, Incorporated
2 A.2d 249 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1938)