American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company as Subrogee of Loomis International, Inc. v. Basic Energy Services Gp, LLP, and Basic Energy Services, Inc. D/B/A Bes Holding Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company as Subrogee of Loomis International, Inc. v. Basic Energy Services Gp, LLP, and Basic Energy Services, Inc. D/B/A Bes Holding Co.

DecidedJanuary 18, 2007

Docket13-06-00185-CV

StatusPublished

This text of American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company as Subrogee of Loomis International, Inc. v. Basic Energy Services Gp, LLP, and Basic Energy Services, Inc. D/B/A Bes Holding Co. (American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company as Subrogee of Loomis International, Inc. v. Basic Energy Services Gp, LLP, and Basic Energy Services, Inc. D/B/A Bes Holding Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company as Subrogee of Loomis International, Inc. v. Basic Energy Services Gp, LLP, and Basic Energy Services, Inc. D/B/A Bes Holding Co., (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-06-185-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

AMERICAN GUARANTEE AND LIABILITY

INSURANCE COMPANY AS SUBROGEE

OF LOOMIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

BASIC ENERGY SERVICES GP, LLP, AND BASIC

ENERGY SERVICES, INC. D/B/A BES HOLDING CO., Appellees.

On appeal from the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company as Subrogee of Loomis International, Inc., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 94thDistrict Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 04-05835-C. After the record and briefs were filed, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice. In the motion, the parties state that they have settled their differences and request that the underlying action be dismissed with prejudice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The joint motion to dismiss with prejudice is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this 18th day of January, 2007.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI