American Gas Machine Co. v. Giggi

Appellate Court of Illinois

American Gas Machine Co. v. Giggi

170 Ill. App. 300, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 768

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMay 20, 1912

DocketGen. No. 16,243

StatusPublished

This text of 170 Ill. App. 300 (American Gas Machine Co. v. Giggi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Gas Machine Co. v. Giggi, 170 Ill. App. 300, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 768 (Ill. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Brown

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error to the Municipal Court of Chicago to reverse a judgment of $32.50 rendered by that Court on November 11, 1909, in favor of the American Cas Machine Company against Silvestro Griggi, the plaintiff in error.

The amount was for rental of a regulator belonging to the Gras Machine Co. applied, at Grigg’s request and under a contract for rental payments, as the Company contends, to certain gas pipes which Griggi used in his business and which he contends he used in connection with a partner who was not joined as defendant in the suit. So far as there is any contradiction in the evidence, however, it is on questions of fact, and there was plainly a case, made by the plaintiff’s evidence to justify the judgment, which is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Brown

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error to the Municipal Court of Chicago to reverse a judgment of $32.50 rendered by that Court on November 11, 1909, in favor of the American Cas Machine Company against Silvestro Griggi, the plaintiff in error.

The amount was for rental of a regulator belonging to the Gras Machine Co. applied, at Grigg’s request and under a contract for rental payments, as the Company contends, to certain gas pipes which Griggi used in his business and which he contends he used in connection with a partner who was not joined as defendant in the suit. So far as there is any contradiction in the evidence, however, it is on questions of fact, and there was plainly a case, made by the plaintiff’s evidence to justify the judgment, which is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 Ill. App. 300, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-gas-machine-co-v-giggi-illappct-1912.