American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Sutherland

53 S.W.2d 1118
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Sutherland. Read the opinion of the Court — 1932 Tex. App. LEXIS 580
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 12, 1932·No. No. 8871.·Published

Opinion

*1119 SMITH, J.

In this case the trial court sustained appel-lee’s general demurrer to appellants’ plea of privilege, and overruled said plea without hearing any evidence, as was done in the companion case of American Fruit Growers, Inc., v. Sutherland (Tex. Civ. App.) BO S.W.(2d) 898, and American Fruit Growers, Inc., v. Luttring (Tex. Civ. App.) 50 S.W.(2d) 901. The pleadings, pleas of privilege, controverting affidavits, and the procedure, orders, and judgments were alike in the three cases.

For the reasons given for reversal in the case first cited, the judgment in this case must be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings. Eekert-Burton Const. Co. v. Board of School Trustees (Tex. Civ. App.) 51 S.W.(2d) 642.

Numerous other grounds for reversal are apparent in the record, but will probably not recur upon another trial, and therefore need not be discussed or specifically decided upon this appeal.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Sutherland, 53 S.W.2d 1118 (Tex. Ct. App. 1932).

53 S.W.2d 1118 (American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Sutherland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Gillette
50 S.W.2d 901 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Eckert-Burton Const. Co. v. Bd. of School Trustees
51 S.W.2d 642 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1932)