American Freight Systems, Inc. v. Alberta

592 So. 2d 804, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 932, 1992 WL 21095
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 5, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1010
StatusPublished

This text of 592 So. 2d 804 (American Freight Systems, Inc. v. Alberta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Freight Systems, Inc. v. Alberta, 592 So. 2d 804, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 932, 1992 WL 21095 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellants, employer/carrier, appeal the judge of compensation claims’ award of workers’ compensation benefits to appellee. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

We agree with employer/carrier that the judge of compensation claims erred in modifying the maximum medical improvement date which had been established by a prior order. That portion of the prior order was not reversed on appeal in Alberta v. American Freight Systems, 565 So.2d 378 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Therefore, the remand occasioned by the opinion in Alberta did not authorize a modification of the maximum medical improvement date. We reverse the maximum medical improvement date established by the appealed order and recognize that appellee’s date of maximum medical improvement remains at March 28, 1986.

We affirm as to the remaining two points raised by employer/carrier.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

BARFIELD and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alberta v. American Freight Systems
565 So. 2d 378 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
592 So. 2d 804, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 932, 1992 WL 21095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-freight-systems-inc-v-alberta-fladistctapp-1992.