American Freehold, etc. Co. v. Candler
10 S.E. 111, 80 Ga. 366
Opinion
The judge’s certificate to the bill of exceptions, in the form prescribed by §4252 of the code, omitted the words ‘‘ is true ” in the first line. The bill of exceptions was therefore dismissed because not properly certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
American Freehold, etc. Co. v. Candler, 10 S.E. 111, 80 Ga. 366 (Ga. 1887).
10 S.E. 111 (American Freehold, etc. Co. v. Candler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blackley v. Bell
1 S.E.2d 676 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Shippey v. Robertson
172 S.E. 231 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Cady v. Cady
131 S.E. 282 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)
Weinberg v. Barnes
118 S.E. 758 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Grant v. Derrick
60 S.E. 157 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Cade v. DuBose
54 S.E. 697 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)