American Foreign Industries, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

American Foreign Industries, Inc. v. United States

61 Cust. Ct. 680, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1653

United States Customs Court·Decided December 31, 1968·No. No. R68/57; reappraisements 279992-A, 279993-A, and 279994-A (Dallas)·Published

Opinion

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those involved in Stockheimer & Harder and American Foreign Industries, Inc. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 801, A.R.D. 218), the court found and held that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402a(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the value oí the involved fish hooks and that such value in each case is the invoiced unit value, packed, or plus packing when not included in the invoice unit price.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those involved in Stockheimer & Harder and American Foreign Industries, Inc. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 801, A.R.D. 218), the court found and held that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402a(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the value oí the involved fish hooks and that such value in each case is the invoiced unit value, packed, or plus packing when not included in the invoice unit price.

American Foreign Industries, Inc. v. United States, 61 Cust. Ct. 680, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1653 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

61 Cust. Ct. 680 (American Foreign Industries, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related