American Fisheries, Inc. v. National Honey, Inc. D/B/A National Commodities Co., National Honey, Inc. D.B.A. NCC Group, Ltd., Jun Yang, Individually and Linhuang, Individuallly

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 21, 2017
Docket01-17-00340-CV
StatusPublished

This text of American Fisheries, Inc. v. National Honey, Inc. D/B/A National Commodities Co., National Honey, Inc. D.B.A. NCC Group, Ltd., Jun Yang, Individually and Linhuang, Individuallly (American Fisheries, Inc. v. National Honey, Inc. D/B/A National Commodities Co., National Honey, Inc. D.B.A. NCC Group, Ltd., Jun Yang, Individually and Linhuang, Individuallly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Fisheries, Inc. v. National Honey, Inc. D/B/A National Commodities Co., National Honey, Inc. D.B.A. NCC Group, Ltd., Jun Yang, Individually and Linhuang, Individuallly, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-17-00340-CV Style: American Fisheries, Inc. v. National Honey, Inc. d/b/a National Commodities Co., National Honey, Inc. d.b.a. NCC Group, Ltd., Jun Yang, individually and Linhuang, Individually Date motion filed*: September 14, 2017 Type of motion: Motion to Extend Time to File Court Reporter’s Record Party filing motion: Appellees National Honey, Inc., Jun Yang and Lin Yang Document to be filed: Reporter Trista Visser’s Record for July 16, 2017 hearing

Is appeal accelerated? No.

If motion to extend time: Original due date: August 28, 2017 Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: August 28, 2017 Date Requested: N/A (30 days from September 14, 2017 request)

Ordered that motion is:  Granted If document is to be filed, document due: October 16, 2017.  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Generally, the reporter is responsible for both filing and requesting an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c). However, because appellees’ motion contends that the reporter advised appellees’ counsel to request 30 days on her behalf due to Hurricane Harvey-related delays, this Court considers Harvey as good cause to suspend Rule 35.3(c)’s operation and construes this motion as made by the reporter and grants it for 30 days. See Emergency Order Authorizing Modification and Suspension of Court Procedures in Proceedings Affected by Disaster, Misc. Docket No. 17-9091 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2017); TEX. R. APP. P. 2.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually Date: September 21, 2017

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
American Fisheries, Inc. v. National Honey, Inc. D/B/A National Commodities Co., National Honey, Inc. D.B.A. NCC Group, Ltd., Jun Yang, Individually and Linhuang, Individuallly, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-fisheries-inc-v-national-honey-inc-dba-national-commodities-texapp-2017.