American Finance Corporation v. DeLong

437 A.2d 1100, 140 Vt. 292, 32 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1710, 1981 Vt. LEXIS 600
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided November 3, 1981·No. 436-80·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

John and Susan DeLong appeal here a deficiency judgment in favor of American Finance Corporation following the finance company’s repossession and resale of the DeLong automobile. The appeal is based on a claim that the company failed to establish at trial that the resale was commercially reasonable within the meaning of 9A V.S.A. § 9 — 504(3), and in accord with our decision in Chittenden Trust Co. v. Maryanski, 138 Vt. 240, 415 A.2d 206 (1980).

We stated in Maryanski that, with respect to deficiency judgments, the secured party has the burden of pleading and proving the commercial reasonableness of the disposition of the secured property. In this case American Finance Corporation sold, for $155.00, an automobile with a suggested listed value of $1,275.00, without presenting any evidence of factors which would explain the inordinate difference. The company failed to meet its burden of proof, and judgment must be entered for the debtors.

Judgment reversed. Judgment entered for the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Finance Corporation v. DeLong, 437 A.2d 1100, 140 Vt. 292, 32 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1710, 1981 Vt. LEXIS 600 (Vt. 1981).

437 A.2d 1100 (American Finance Corporation v. DeLong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Federal Financial Co. v. Papadopoulos
721 A.2d 501 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1998)
Sunjet, Inc. v. Ford Motor Credit Co.
703 S.W.2d 285 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)