American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. Briarwood Oaks, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. Briarwood Oaks, Inc.

102 A.D.2d 858, 477 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19059

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 102 A.D.2d 858 (American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. Briarwood Oaks, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. Briarwood Oaks, Inc., 102 A.D.2d 858, 477 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19059 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action for a declaratory judgment as to whether plaintiff has an obligation to defend or indemnify its insured, Briarwood Oaks, Inc., plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), dated October 11, 1983, as denied its motion for summary judgment, granted Briarwood Oaks, Inc.’s cross motion for summary judgment, and declared that [859]*859plaintiff must “defend and indemnify Briarwood Oaks, Inc. for any compensatory damages awarded in the action Lorraine Casino, Et AL, V. Kraham Leasing Corp., EtAl., 82 Civ 1131”. H Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs. 11 We affirm the determination of Special Term, as contained in its judgment, that plaintiff is obligated to defend and indemnify defendant Briarwood Oaks, Inc. as to compensatory damages. Bracken, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action for a declaratory judgment as to whether plaintiff has an obligation to defend or indemnify its insured, Briarwood Oaks, Inc., plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), dated October 11, 1983, as denied its motion for summary judgment, granted Briarwood Oaks, Inc.’s cross motion for summary judgment, and declared that [859]*859plaintiff must “defend and indemnify Briarwood Oaks, Inc. for any compensatory damages awarded in the action Lorraine Casino, Et AL, V. Kraham Leasing Corp., EtAl., 82 Civ 1131”. H Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs. 11 We affirm the determination of Special Term, as contained in its judgment, that plaintiff is obligated to defend and indemnify defendant Briarwood Oaks, Inc. as to compensatory damages. Bracken, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 A.D.2d 858, 477 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-fidelity-fire-insurance-v-briarwood-oaks-inc-nyappdiv-1984.