American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Newman

Court of Appeals of Texas

American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Newman

83 S.W.2d 710, 1935 Tex. App. LEXIS 614

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 1, 1935

DocketNo. 7833.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 83 S.W.2d 710 (American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Newman, 83 S.W.2d 710, 1935 Tex. App. LEXIS 614 (Tex. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

BAUGH, Justice.

At a former term of this court, we affirmed the judgment of the district court of Caldwell county overruling the plea of privilege of the American Fidelity & Casualty Company to be sued in the district court of Dallas county [60 S.W.(2d) 482]. Subsequent thereto the appellant applied to the Supreme Court for writ of mandamus to require this court to certify to the Supreme Court the questions of law involved. See American Fid. & Cas. Co. v. McClendon, C. J., et al. (Tex. Com. App.) 81 S.W. (2d) 493. On April 3, 1935, the Supreme Court, in Grasso v. Cannon Ball Motor Freight Lines, 81 S.W. (2d) 482, which case involved the same question as that involved in this case, determined that the insurance company was not a proper or necessary party to the suit filed by the plaintiff against the motor carrier. In the opinion rendered on appellant’s application for a writ of mandamus, the Supreme Court ordered the writ to issue, but made the following holding: “Should, however, the Honorable Court of Civil Appeals, in .view of the decision this day made in the case of Grasso v. Cannon Ball Motor Freight Lines [(Tex. Com. App.) 81 S.W. (2d) 482], set aside its previous judgment and enter judgment in accordance with our decision in that case [Cannon Ball Motor Freight Lines v. Grasso, 81 S.W. (2d) 482], it will not be necessary for it to certify the question to this court.”

In accordance, therefore, with the holding of the Supreme Court in the Grasso Case, and the suggestion made as above quoted, our former judgment affirming the judgment of the trial court is set aside, and in lieu thereof the following judgment is entered: The judgment of the trial court is reversed, with instructions to the trial court to transfer the case, in so far as the defendant American Fidelity & Casualty Company is concerned, to the district court of Dallas county, in accordance with the plea of privilege filed by it.

*711 The clerk of this court is directed to transmit to the clerk of the Supreme Court certified copy of this judgment showing compliance by this court with the suggestion made in the opinion of the Supreme Court upon said application for the writ of mandamus.

Former judgment set aside; judgment of trial court reversed, with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BAUGH, Justice.

At a former term of this court, we affirmed the judgment of the district court of Caldwell county overruling the plea of privilege of the American Fidelity & Casualty Company to be sued in the district court of Dallas county [60 S.W.(2d) 482]. Subsequent thereto the appellant applied to the Supreme Court for writ of mandamus to require this court to certify to the Supreme Court the questions of law involved. See American Fid. & Cas. Co. v. McClendon, C. J., et al. (Tex. Com. App.) 81 S.W. (2d) 493. On April 3, 1935, the Supreme Court, in Grasso v. Cannon Ball Motor Freight Lines, 81 S.W. (2d) 482, which case involved the same question as that involved in this case, determined that the insurance company was not a proper or necessary party to the suit filed by the plaintiff against the motor carrier. In the opinion rendered on appellant’s application for a writ of mandamus, the Supreme Court ordered the writ to issue, but made the following holding: “Should, however, the Honorable Court of Civil Appeals, in .view of the decision this day made in the case of Grasso v. Cannon Ball Motor Freight Lines [(Tex. Com. App.) 81 S.W. (2d) 482], set aside its previous judgment and enter judgment in accordance with our decision in that case [Cannon Ball Motor Freight Lines v. Grasso, 81 S.W. (2d) 482], it will not be necessary for it to certify the question to this court.”

In accordance, therefore, with the holding of the Supreme Court in the Grasso Case, and the suggestion made as above quoted, our former judgment affirming the judgment of the trial court is set aside, and in lieu thereof the following judgment is entered: The judgment of the trial court is reversed, with instructions to the trial court to transfer the case, in so far as the defendant American Fidelity & Casualty Company is concerned, to the district court of Dallas county, in accordance with the plea of privilege filed by it.

*711 The clerk of this court is directed to transmit to the clerk of the Supreme Court certified copy of this judgment showing compliance by this court with the suggestion made in the opinion of the Supreme Court upon said application for the writ of mandamus.

Former judgment set aside; judgment of trial court reversed, with instructions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 S.W.2d 710, 1935 Tex. App. LEXIS 614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-fidelity-casualty-co-v-newman-texapp-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack