American Fence, Inc. v. Wham

559 P.2d 824, 93 Nev. 26, 1977 Nev. LEXIS 457
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided February 3, 1977·No. Nos. 8484 and 8951·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[27]*27OPINION

Per Curiam:

Harry Wham, Antionette Wham and Edwin J. Dotson, co-owners of real property known as “Whamco Divers,” 2490 Boulder Highway, leased the same to American Fence, Inc., for one year commencing February 1, 1975. Notice to quit and terminate lease was received by lessee September 12, 1975. An unlawful detainer action was commenced October 2, 1975, and the district court thereafter ordered restitution of the premises to lessors. Effectuation of that order was stayed pending decision on appeal therefrom in case No. 8484.1

The validity of the notice to quit and terminate lease is the point in issue. Proper notice is a jurisdictional precondition to an action for unlawful detainer. Gasser v. Jet Craft Ltd., 87 Nev. 376, 487 P.2d 346 (1971); Aikins v. Andrews, 91 Nev. 746, 542 P.2d 734 (1975).

Here, the notice was signed by one of the co-owners, colessors on behalf of all co-owners, colessors. The record does not affirmatively show that Edwin J. Dotson, the signatory, was authorized to act for his colessors. Consequently, there is a defect in proof regarding jurisdiction, McNally v. Leach, 205 S.W. 82 (Mo.Ct.App. 1918), and the order for restitution must be set aside.2

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Fence, Inc. v. Wham, 559 P.2d 824, 93 Nev. 26, 1977 Nev. LEXIS 457 (Neb. 1977).

559 P.2d 824 (American Fence, Inc. v. Wham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Fence, Inc. v. Wham
603 P.2d 274 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1979)