American Federation of Employees, Local No. 572 v. City of Dover

345 A.2d 912, 115 N.H. 491, 1975 N.H. LEXIS 343
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedSeptember 19, 1975
DocketNo. 7302
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 345 A.2d 912 (American Federation of Employees, Local No. 572 v. City of Dover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Federation of Employees, Local No. 572 v. City of Dover, 345 A.2d 912, 115 N.H. 491, 1975 N.H. LEXIS 343 (N.H. 1975).

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion

On August 22, 1975, twenty union and five nonunion employees refused to punch in their time cards and commence work following a labor dispute. The Dover city manager discharged these employees on the grounds that they violated an existing labor agreement and participated in an illegal strike.

The plaintiffs petitioned the superior court and asked that pending a hearing on the merits the city be temporarily enjoined from hiring replacement employees and for a temporary order reinstating the discharged employees. The Trial Court (Mullavey, J.), after hearing, ordered the discharged employees to be reinstated pending a hearing on the merits of the petition. The parties are before this court as a result of a petition by the city asking this court to stay [492]*492the order of the superior court pending a hearing on the merits of plaintiffs’ petition.

In effect, the city is asking for a writ of prohibition. See State ex rel. Regan v. Superior Court, 102 N.H. 224, 153 A.2d 403 (1959); State v. Superior Court, 106 N.H. 228, 208 A.2d 832 (1965). The city seeks to restrain and stay action of an inferior court. The petition is within the jurisdiction of this court (RSA 490:4 (Supp. 1973)) but our authority is exercised with caution and forbearance and only when the necessity to act is clear. The order complained of merely preserves the status quo pending a hearing on the merits which shall be held expeditiously. Hillsborough v. Superior Court, 109 N.H. 333, 334, 251 A.2d 325, 326 (1969); Manchester Educ. Ass’n v. Superior Court, 109 N.H. 513, 514, 257 A.2d 23, 24 (1969).

Petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Cigna Healthcare, Inc.
777 A.2d 884 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 2001)
Appeal of Seacoast Anti-Pollution League
490 A.2d 1329 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1984)
Rochester School Board v. Public Employee Labor Relations Board
398 A.2d 823 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
345 A.2d 912, 115 N.H. 491, 1975 N.H. LEXIS 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-federation-of-employees-local-no-572-v-city-of-dover-nh-1975.