American & Far Eastern Trading Co. v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.
This text of 678 F.2d 830 (American & Far Eastern Trading Co. v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Before BROWNING, Chief Judge; SKO-PIL and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
For the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court, American & Far Eastern Trading Company v. Sea-Land Service, Inc., 493 F.Supp. 125 (N.D.Cal.1980), the judgment is affirmed.
Appellant’s petition for rehearing is denied. We decline appellant’s suggestion that we reconsider Judge Schwarzer’s decision in light of Allied Eagle Trading Corp. v. S. S. Yang Ming, 672 F.2d 1055 (2d Cir. 1982). There, the Second Circuit relied primarily upon a contract analysis in dealing with an unambiguous bill of lading; here, there was a course of dealing and a somewhat ambiguous bill of lading. Given the facts of this case, Judge Schwarzer correctly relied, in part, upon a notice analysis.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
678 F.2d 830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-far-eastern-trading-co-v-sea-land-service-inc-ca9-1982.