American Express Co. v. Vella

227 A.2d 721, 94 N.J. Super. 258
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedMarch 16, 1967
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 227 A.2d 721 (American Express Co. v. Vella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Express Co. v. Vella, 227 A.2d 721, 94 N.J. Super. 258 (N.J. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

94 N.J. Super. 258 (1967)
227 A.2d 721

AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, AN UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CHARLES VELLA AND MARIA VELLA, DEFENDANTS, RIVER EDGE SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 6, 1967.
Decided March 16, 1967.

*259 Before Judges CONFORD, FOLEY and LEONARD.

Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Major & Major, attorneys).

Mr. Ronald M. Sturtz argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Hannoch, Weisman, Stern & Besser, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

River Edge Savings and Loan Association appeals from an order of the Law Division directing it, as garnishee, to turn over to plaintiff the sum of $8,895.34 plus interest, such funds being part of a savings account in the names of Charles and Maria Vella, judgment debtors of plaintiff.

*260 Appellant argues that the levy under the writ of attachment was invalid because the passbook was not seized nor its negotiation enjoined. We cannot agree.

The levy was proper under R.R. 4:77-12, with particular reference to the (e) section of the rule. The passbook was not negotiable commercial paper, nor negotiable investment securities — (c) and (d) of the same section.

Appellant argues also that since the passbook was in custodia legis it was not subject to levy. This may be so. However, the savings account itself was not in custodia legis but was a chose in action in which the Vellas had a subsisting interest. It was therefore subject to levy.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

T & C Leasing, Inc. v. Wachovia Bank
23 A.3d 440 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2011)
Sylvan Equipment Rental Corp. v. C. Washington & Son, Inc.
679 A.2d 213 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1995)
Citibank, South Dakota, N.A. v. Coffey
657 A.2d 475 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 A.2d 721, 94 N.J. Super. 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-express-co-v-vella-njsuperctappdiv-1967.