American Express Co. v. United States

44 Cust. Ct. 570

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in American Express Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 Cust. Ct. 704 →

United States Customs Court·Decided February 19, 1960·No. Reap. Dec. 9598; Entry Nos. 899423; 908148·Published

Opinion

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeals for a re-appraisement were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official records discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeals for a re-appraisement were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official records discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

American Express Co. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 570 (cusc 1960).

Pincite

44 Cust. Ct. 570 (American Express Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.