American Express Co. v. Conant
This text of 8 N.W. 574 (American Express Co. v. Conant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action was commenced in justice’s court, and the return of the constable showed that he served the summons “by reading the same to the defendant and delivering to R. G. Cooper, agent of the American Express Company at Lakeview, a copy thereof.” The defendant did not appear. The statute, 1 Comp. L. § 1624, prescribes the mode of service of process in such cases. As there was no attempt to comply with such provisions the court acquired no jurisdiction. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Owen 30 Mich. 443; Hebel v. Amazon Ins. Co. 33 Mich. 400; L. S. etc. Co. v. Hunt 39 Mich. 469.
The judgment of the justice must be quashed and held for naught with costs to plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 N.W. 574, 45 Mich. 642, 1881 Mich. LEXIS 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-express-co-v-conant-mich-1881.