American Electrical Works v. Varley Duplex Magnet Co.

59 A. 110, 26 R.I. 440, 1904 R.I. LEXIS 97
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided October 22, 1904·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The restraining order in general terms for *441 bids the respondent to remove machinery which it had placed upon or about the premises of the complainant. This machinery was voluntarily supplied by the respondent as a contribution towards the joint manufacturing business to be carried on by the parties under their agreement.

Van Slyck & Mumford, for complainants. Edwards & Angelí, for respondents.

No necessity for retaking any part of this machinery is shown, even if it would not be a violation of the agreement to use it or allow' it to be used elsewhere in this country.

(1) A restraining order is not expected to do final and complete justice between the parties to a suit; its office is to hold matters approximately in statu quo, so as to prevent irreparable injury, until, on final hearing with the whole matter before it, the court may determine and adjust all rights involved.

(2) Since the entry of this order a hearing has been had upon the respondent’s demurrer, and an opinion was rendered July 28, 1904; but no draft of a decree has been offered by either party, and no answer has been filed to the bill. At this stage of the case we do not conceive it to be our duty to consider questions which would be more properly presented at a final hearing.

The motion to modify the order is therefore denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Electrical Works v. Varley Duplex Magnet Co., 59 A. 110, 26 R.I. 440, 1904 R.I. LEXIS 97 (R.I. 1904).

59 A. 110 (American Electrical Works v. Varley Duplex Magnet Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bruneau, 00-0775 (2001)
Superior Court of Rhode Island, 2001
Studley Land Co. v. Myers
103 A.2d 924 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1954)