American Electrical Novelty Co. v. Newgold

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

American Electrical Novelty Co. v. Newgold

99 F. 567, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 5047

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedJanuary 13, 1900

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 99 F. 567 (American Electrical Novelty Co. v. Newgold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Electrical Novelty Co. v. Newgold, 99 F. 567, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 5047 (circtsdny 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

IACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The decision of Judge Wheeler (98 Fed. 895), being rendered in a case where there was no opposition, is not such an adjudication as will entitle complainant to a preliminary injunction in another suit, where there is no proof of long-continued public acquiescence, and where the validity of the patents, if construed broadly enough to cover defendant’s device, is vigorously contested. Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The decision of Judge Wheeler (98 Fed. 895), being rendered in a case where there was no opposition, is not such an adjudication as will entitle complainant to a preliminary injunction in another suit, where there is no proof of long-continued public acquiescence, and where the validity of the patents, if construed broadly enough to cover defendant’s device, is vigorously contested. Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 F. 567, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 5047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-electrical-novelty-co-v-newgold-circtsdny-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack