American Electrical Novelty Co. v. Newgold
99 F. 567, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 5047
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided January 13, 1900·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
The decision of Judge Wheeler (98 Fed. 895), being rendered in a case where there was no opposition, is not such an adjudication as will entitle complainant to a preliminary injunction in another suit, where there is no proof of long-continued public acquiescence, and where the validity of the patents, if construed broadly enough to cover defendant’s device, is vigorously contested. Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
American Electrical Novelty Co. v. Newgold, 99 F. 567, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 5047 (circtsdny 1900).
99 F. 567 (American Electrical Novelty Co. v. Newgold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Warford Corporation v. Bryan Screw MacH. Products Co.
44 F.2d 713 (Sixth Circuit, 1930)
National Paint Removing Co. of Washington v. Cochran
287 F. 376 (W.D. Washington, 1923)
Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. Leed & Catlin Co.
180 F. 778 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1910)
American Electrical Novelty & Mfg. Co. v. Newgold
108 F. 957 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1901)