American Electric Co. v. United States

60 Ct. Cl. 993, 1925 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 411, 1925 WL 2789
United States Court of Claims·Decided June 8, 1925·No. No. B-14·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[994] MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT

The defendant concedes, and we think properly, that the plaintiff should recover the amount sued for, $802.34. It represented deduction on account of liquidated damages, which the defendant’s officers making the same concluded should be deducted from the amount due plaintiff under the contract. It appears, however, that the date upon which these officers relied, November 14th, was erroneous. What the parties intended was that the deliveries under this contract should commence with the date on which the completion of order number 7087 was due. Order 7087 antedated the contract in question and was due for completion on December 10. Taking December 10 as the correct date, all deliveries were made in due time, according to the stipulations of the contract, and plaintiff was not liable for liquidated damages.

Graham, Judge, took no part in the decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Electric Co. v. United States, 60 Ct. Cl. 993, 1925 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 411, 1925 WL 2789 (cc 1925).

60 Ct. Cl. 993 (American Electric Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ship Construction & Trading Co. v. United States
91 Ct. Cl. 419 (Court of Claims, 1940)