American Dyewood Co. v. United States
25 Cust. Ct. 285, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 343
United States Customs Court·Decided October 3, 1950·No. No. 54718; protests 155178-K, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
When the case was called for trial the examiner who passed the instant merchandise testified that its chief use is as a stain and that it is not a pigment. Counsel for the defendant conceded that as to the soluble Van Dyke Brown here involved “there is merit to the plaintiff’s case.” Upon the record presented the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
American Dyewood Co. v. United States, 25 Cust. Ct. 285, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 343 (cusc 1950).
25 Cust. Ct. 285 (American Dyewood Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.