American Dyewood Co. v. United States

25 Cust. Ct. 285, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 343
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedOctober 3, 1950
DocketNo. 54718; protests 155178-K, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 25 Cust. Ct. 285 (American Dyewood Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Dyewood Co. v. United States, 25 Cust. Ct. 285, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 343 (cusc 1950).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

When the case was called for trial the examiner who passed the instant merchandise testified that its chief use is as a stain and that it is not a pigment. Counsel for the defendant conceded that as to the soluble Van Dyke Brown here involved “there is merit to the plaintiff’s case.” Upon the record presented the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Cust. Ct. 285, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-dyewood-co-v-united-states-cusc-1950.