American Dredging Company v. Calmar Steamship Corporation, Cross-Libellant
218 F.2d 823, 1955 A.M.C. 541
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 31, 1955·No. 11445_1·Published·Cited by 9 cases
Opinion
In this maritime collision case, the district court in a carefully considered decision found the appellant solely to blame. Our own examination of the record satisfies us that this finding is supported by substantial evidence. The decree of the district court, 121 F.Supp. 255, will be affirmed. McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 75 S.Ct. 6.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
American Dredging Company v. Calmar Steamship Corporation, Cross-Libellant, 218 F.2d 823, 1955 A.M.C. 541 (3d Cir. 1955).
218 F.2d 823 (American Dredging Company v. Calmar Steamship Corporation, Cross-Libellant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Allied Chemical Corporation v. Hess Tankship Company of Delaware, Amerada Hess Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Cross American Hull Syndicate, Defendants-Third Party v. Allied Towing Corporation as Owner of the Tug Socrates, Third Party Defendants-Appellants-Cross v. Defelice Towing Company
661 F.2d 1044 (Third Circuit, 1981)
Allied Chemical Corp. v. Hess Tankship Co.
661 F.2d 1044 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)
United States v. Osage Co., Inc.
414 F. Supp. 1097 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1976)
Petersen v. Head Construction Company
367 F. Supp. 1072 (District of Columbia, 1973)
William B. Patton Towing Company v. Spiller
440 S.W.2d 869 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Chesapeake Bay Bridge And Tunnel District v. J. Lauritzen
404 F.2d 1001 (Fourth Circuit, 1968)
Chesapeake Bay Bridge & Tunnel District v. Lauritzen
404 F.2d 1001 (Fourth Circuit, 1968)
Jones Towing, Inc. v. United States
277 F. Supp. 839 (E.D. Louisiana, 1967)
Posey W. Myers, and Clyde W. Myers v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
218 F.2d 823 (Fourth Circuit, 1955)