American District Steam Co. v. Wheeler
This text of 181 A.D. 949 (American District Steam Co. v. Wheeler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the form of the indorsement, together with the correspondence in evidence, constituted some substantial evidence that the plaintiff accepted the notes in suit with the understanding that the defendant had indorsed them so as to bind the estate, and not himself individually, and that, therefore, the trial justice should have submitted that question to the jury and not have directed a verdict for the plaintiff. Thomas, Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Blackmar, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 A.D. 949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-district-steam-co-v-wheeler-nyappdiv-1917.