American Cyanamid v. St. Louis Univ.

Eighth Circuit

American Cyanamid v. St. Louis Univ.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 14, 2000

Docket99-2510

StatusUnpublished

This text of American Cyanamid v. St. Louis Univ. (American Cyanamid v. St. Louis Univ.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Cyanamid v. St. Louis Univ., (8th Cir. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 99-2510 ___________

American Cyanamid Company, * a Corporation, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * St. Louis University, a Corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * ___________

Submitted: December 28, 1999 Filed: January 14, 2000 ___________

Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

American Cyanamid Company appeals from the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in its declaratory judgment action seeking to determine whether Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.060 (1994) bars an action for contribution against Cyanamid by Saint Louis University. After de novo review, see Brown v. Home Ins. Co., 176 F.3d 1102, 1105 (8th Cir. 1999), we conclude the district court’s judgment was proper for

1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. the reasons stated in its thorough opinion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI