American Customs Brokg. Co. v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 344, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 101
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 11, 1953
DocketNo. 57071; protests 170360-K, etc. (Honolulu)
StatusPublished

This text of 30 Cust. Ct. 344 (American Customs Brokg. Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Customs Brokg. Co. v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 344, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 101 (cusc 1953).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the two classes of merchandise are the same in all material respects as those involved in Calif-Asia Co., Ltd. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited decision, the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 412, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under said paragraph, as modified by said T. D. 51802.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Cust. Ct. 344, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-customs-brokg-co-v-united-states-cusc-1953.