American Customs Brokg. Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

American Customs Brokg. Co. v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 344, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 101

United States Customs Court·Decided February 11, 1953·No. No. 57071; protests 170360-K, etc. (Honolulu)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the two classes of merchandise are the same in all material respects as those involved in Calif-Asia Co., Ltd. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited decision, the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 412, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under said paragraph, as modified by said T. D. 51802.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the two classes of merchandise are the same in all material respects as those involved in Calif-Asia Co., Ltd. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited decision, the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 412, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under said paragraph, as modified by said T. D. 51802.

American Customs Brokg. Co. v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 344, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 101 (cusc 1953).

Pincite

30 Cust. Ct. 344 (American Customs Brokg. Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.