American Culinary Corp. v. General Star Indemnity Co.

79 F. App'x 849
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 29, 2003
DocketNo. 02-3575
StatusPublished

This text of 79 F. App'x 849 (American Culinary Corp. v. General Star Indemnity Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Culinary Corp. v. General Star Indemnity Co., 79 F. App'x 849 (6th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.

American Culinary Corporation (“ACC”) appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of General Star Indemnity Company (“General Star”) and denying ACC’s cross motion for summary judgment in this diversity action brought by ACC to recover for an alleged breach of an indemnity insurance contract by General Star. The indemnity insurance policy at issue was issued by General Star to Provident Bank, which held the real estate mortgage on the property insured. The district court held that the express terms of the policy limited the coverage to the lesser of the replacement cost of the building or the outstanding balance of the mortgagee’s loan. Accordingly, the district court held that ACC, which was the assignee of the mortgagee of the property insured, had an insurable interest only in the amount of the outstanding balance of the mortgage loan; that ACC’s recovery under the policy was limited to the amount of the outstanding balance of that loan; and that ACC’s interest was limited to that aggregate amount, and the fact that the insurance policy provided coverage on a “per occurrence” basis did not affect the express limitation on ACC’s interest.

Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that the district court’s order thoroughly and accurately sets out both the undisputed facts and the governing law, and clearly articulates the reasons underlying its decision. We are persuaded that we can add nothing to the district court’s excellent opinion, and that issuance of a full written opinion by this [850]*850court would serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion, we AFFIRM.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 F. App'x 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-culinary-corp-v-general-star-indemnity-co-ca6-2003.