American Creosoting Co. v. Reddington

146 N.E. 761, 83 Ind. App. 365, 1925 Ind. App. LEXIS 45
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 18, 1925
DocketNo. 11,409.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 146 N.E. 761 (American Creosoting Co. v. Reddington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Creosoting Co. v. Reddington, 146 N.E. 761, 83 Ind. App. 365, 1925 Ind. App. LEXIS 45 (Ind. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

McMahan, J.

On February 16, 1915, appellant filed its complaint to review a judgment rendered against it and in favor of appellee, March 21, 1914; a motion for a new trial having been overruled prior to the rendition of the judgment.

From a judgment denying the review, appellant appeals. Appellee, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for the reason that appellant’s complaint to review was filed more than 180 days after the original judgment was rendered and at a time when there was no right to an appeal from that judgment.

On authority of Talge Mahogany Co. v. Astoria Mahogany Co. (1923), 195 Ind. 433, 141 N. E. 50, 145 N. E. 495, motion to dismiss is sustained, and appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morton-Finney v. Jennings
241 N.E.2d 77 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1968)
Browne v. Blood
196 N.E.2d 745 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 N.E. 761, 83 Ind. App. 365, 1925 Ind. App. LEXIS 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-creosoting-co-v-reddington-indctapp-1925.