American Charm Corp. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

56 Misc. 2d 574, 289 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1795
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 25, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 56 Misc. 2d 574 (American Charm Corp. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Charm Corp. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance, 56 Misc. 2d 574, 289 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1795 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The loss of plaintiffs’ property was from an automobile which at the time the loss occurred did not have actually in or upon such vehicle ” the designated custodian. Hence defendants are not liable, because the actual loss occurred under circumstances falling squarely within the exclusory clause. The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted.

Concur — Street, J. P., Gold and Hofstadter, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

E.M.M.I. Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance
84 P.3d 385 (California Supreme Court, 2004)
American Stone Diamond, Inc. v. Lloyds of London
934 F. Supp. 839 (S.D. Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 Misc. 2d 574, 289 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-charm-corp-v-st-paul-fire-marine-insurance-nyappterm-1968.