American Centennial Insurance v. Williams

233 A.D.2d 320, 649 N.Y.S.2d 190, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11576
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 4, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 233 A.D.2d 320 (American Centennial Insurance v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Centennial Insurance v. Williams, 233 A.D.2d 320, 649 N.Y.S.2d 190, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11576 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of the respondent’s underinsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated December 1, 1995, which denied the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the petition is granted.

It is well settled that a party cannot be compelled to submit to arbitration unless the agreement to arbitrate expressly and unequivocally encompasses the subject matter of the particular dispute (see, Bowmer v Bowmer, 50 NY2d 288, 293-294; Matter of Trump [Refco Props.], 194 AD2d 70). The burden of proof is on the party seeking arbitration (see, Marben Realty Co. v Sweeney, 87 AD2d 561). Although the insurance policy at issue contained an agreement to arbitrate uninsured motorist claims, there was no such agreement with respect to underinsured motorist claims. Furthermore, the time period set forth in CPLR 7503 (c) to commence a proceeding to stay arbitration does not apply here, as the application was made on the ground that no agreement to arbitrate exists (see, Matter of Matarasso [321]*321[Continental Cas. Co.], 56 NY2d 264). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Pizzuto, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Galvez v. Jetsmarter, Inc.
S.D. New York, 2019
Galeana v. Mahasan Inc.
S.D. New York, 2019
Kutluca v. PQ New York Inc.
266 F. Supp. 3d 691 (S.D. New York, 2017)
Astoria Equities 2000 LLC v. Halletts A Development Co., LLC
47 Misc. 3d 171 (New York Supreme Court, 2014)
Personal Communications Devices, LLC v. HTC America Inc.
40 Misc. 3d 790 (New York Supreme Court, 2013)
Cusimano v. Berita Realty, LLC
103 A.D.3d 720 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Whitelock v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC
82 A.D.3d 1212 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Rahman v. Park
63 A.D.3d 812 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Dash & Sons, Inc. v. Tops Markets, LLC
30 A.D.3d 998 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. v. Home Insurance
302 A.D.2d 118 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
General Railway Signal Corp. v. L.K. Comstock & Co.
254 A.D.2d 759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Allstate Insurance v. Roseboro
247 A.D.2d 379 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 A.D.2d 320, 649 N.Y.S.2d 190, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-centennial-insurance-v-williams-nyappdiv-1996.