American Cent. Ins. v. Heiserman

67 F. 947, 15 C.C.A. 95, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2821
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 13, 1895·No. No. 542·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

CALDWELL, Circuit Judge.

The first assignment is that the circuit court erred in not sustaining the defendant’s demurrer to the evidence. This demurrer was interposed at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, and, when overruled by the court, the defendant proceeded to introduce its evidence. This was a waiver of the demurrer. The only other assignment not waived by counsel in the argument of the case is that the court wrongly instructed the jury on the measure of damages. But no exception was taken to the charge at the trial, or, if an exception was taken, that fact does not appear upon the record, and, not appearing of record, has no existence as a predicate for error. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Cent. Ins. v. Heiserman, 67 F. 947, 15 C.C.A. 95, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2821 (8th Cir. 1895).

67 F. 947 (American Cent. Ins. v. Heiserman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Karapa
173 F. 607 (Eighth Circuit, 1909)
Barnard v. Randle
110 F. 906 (Eighth Circuit, 1901)