American Cement Co. v. Dollak

Supreme Court of Connecticut

American Cement Co. v. Dollak

157 A. 925, 114 Conn. 714, 1931 Conn. LEXIS 25

DecidedDecember 8, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 157 A. 925 (American Cement Co. v. Dollak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Cement Co. v. Dollak, 157 A. 925, 114 Conn. 714, 1931 Conn. LEXIS 25 (Colo. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff brought an action against one Calabro, and while the suit was pending secured an order for further attachment which was served upon the defendant. The court reached the conclusion that at the time this order was served, October 2d, the defendant was indebted to Calabro in the sum of $600 *715 and gave judgment for this amount. The finding cannot be corrected. It states that the defendant on October 2d disclosed to the sheriff who served the order of attachment that he owed Calabro $600 and also found that he made the same statement to the president of the plaintiff corporation on September 30th, the day after the defendant claims to have made his final payment on the contract to Calabro. These findings are not attacked and in connection with the other facts found are sufficient to support the conclusion reached.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff brought an action against one Calabro, and while the suit was pending secured an order for further attachment which was served upon the defendant. The court reached the conclusion that at the time this order was served, October 2d, the defendant was indebted to Calabro in the sum of $600 *715 and gave judgment for this amount. The finding cannot be corrected. It states that the defendant on October 2d disclosed to the sheriff who served the order of attachment that he owed Calabro $600 and also found that he made the same statement to the president of the plaintiff corporation on September 30th, the day after the defendant claims to have made his final payment on the contract to Calabro. These findings are not attacked and in connection with the other facts found are sufficient to support the conclusion reached.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 A. 925, 114 Conn. 714, 1931 Conn. LEXIS 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-cement-co-v-dollak-conn-1931.