American Casualty Co. of Reading v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Ninth Circuit

American Casualty Co. of Reading v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

71 F. App'x 760

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 14, 2003

DocketNo. 02-15909; D.C. No. CV-99-20808-RMW

StatusPublished

This text of 71 F. App'x 760 (American Casualty Co. of Reading v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Casualty Co. of Reading v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance, 71 F. App'x 760 (9th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

We have thoroughly reviewed the record in this case, the briefs and the able arguments of counsel. Appellant St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company (St.Paul) presents no evidence that it relied upon the original mistaken contract. Neither does it present evidence that appellees American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania and Transcontinental Insurance Company acted fraudulently or collusively or with unclean hands. St. Paul is bound by the reformation of the contract.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for the reasons set forth in the orders of the district court filed on November 7, 2001, April 3, 2002, and April 9, 2002.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM

**

We have thoroughly reviewed the record in this case, the briefs and the able arguments of counsel. Appellant St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company (St.Paul) presents no evidence that it relied upon the original mistaken contract. Neither does it present evidence that appellees American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania and Transcontinental Insurance Company acted fraudulently or collusively or with unclean hands. St. Paul is bound by the reformation of the contract.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for the reasons set forth in the orders of the district court filed on November 7, 2001, April 3, 2002, and April 9, 2002.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 F. App'x 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-casualty-co-of-reading-v-st-paul-fire-marine-insurance-ca9-2003.