American Can Co. v. Williams

153 F. 882, 82 C.C.A. 628, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4473
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 17, 1907·No. No. 176·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A rehearing was granted at the request of the Comptroller of the Currency. A majority of the court is of the opinion that the order of the Circuit Court does not interfere with the Comptroller’s administration of the affairs of the insolvent bank, except so far as may be necessary to preserve the lights of complainant. Our decision was simply to the effect that, when a party asserts the ownership of property or a specific lien thereon, it is within the discretion of the trial court to retain the property within its juris[883]*883diction until the questions at issue can be determined. To permit the property to be removed from the jurisdiction of the court is, in effect, deciding in limine that the complainant has no cause of action.

The former decision of the court is reaffirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Can Co. v. Williams, 153 F. 882, 82 C.C.A. 628, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4473 (2d Cir. 1907).

153 F. 882 (American Can Co. v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Way v. Camden Safe Deposit & Trust Co.
21 F. Supp. 700 (D. New Jersey, 1937)
Patek v. Patek
131 N.W. 1103 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1911)