American Business Credit, Inc. v. Sanabria

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

American Business Credit, Inc. v. Sanabria

19 A.D.3d 624, 799 N.Y.S.2d 77, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7335

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.3d 624 (American Business Credit, Inc. v. Sanabria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Business Credit, Inc. v. Sanabria, 19 A.D.3d 624, 799 N.Y.S.2d 77, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7335 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Israel Sanabria appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated May 21, 2004, as denied, without a hearing, those branches of his motion which were to vacate a referee’s deed and judgment of foreclosure, and to dismiss the action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, his equity of redemption in the subject property was not preserved by a stay (see RPAPL 1341 [2]; EMC Mtge. Corp. v Bobb, 296 AD2d 476, 478 [2002]; Green Point Sav. Bank v Oppenheim, 237 AD2d 409, 410 [1997]). Further, the Supreme Court properly denied, without a hearing, those branches of his motion which were, inter alia, to vacate the underlying judgment of foreclosure on the ground of lack of proper service of process. The appellant’s conclusory denial of receipt was insufficient to raise an issue of fact in opposition to the plaintiffs prima facie evidence of proper service (see Dolec Consultants v Lancer Litho Packaging Corp., 245 AD2d 415 [1997]; Manhattan Sav. Bank v Kohen, 231 AD2d 499, 500 [1996]; Sando Realty Corp. v Aris, 209 AD2d 682 [1994]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.E, Goldstein, Luciano and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Israel Sanabria appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated May 21, 2004, as denied, without a hearing, those branches of his motion which were to vacate a referee’s deed and judgment of foreclosure, and to dismiss the action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, his equity of redemption in the subject property was not preserved by a stay (see RPAPL 1341 [2]; EMC Mtge. Corp. v Bobb, 296 AD2d 476, 478 [2002]; Green Point Sav. Bank v Oppenheim, 237 AD2d 409, 410 [1997]). Further, the Supreme Court properly denied, without a hearing, those branches of his motion which were, inter alia, to vacate the underlying judgment of foreclosure on the ground of lack of proper service of process. The appellant’s conclusory denial of receipt was insufficient to raise an issue of fact in opposition to the plaintiffs prima facie evidence of proper service (see Dolec Consultants v Lancer Litho Packaging Corp., 245 AD2d 415 [1997]; Manhattan Sav. Bank v Kohen, 231 AD2d 499, 500 [1996]; Sando Realty Corp. v Aris, 209 AD2d 682 [1994]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.E, Goldstein, Luciano and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.3d 624, 799 N.Y.S.2d 77, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-business-credit-inc-v-sanabria-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack