American Bulb Co. v. Spiwak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

American Bulb Co. v. Spiwak

251 A.D. 854, 298 N.Y.S. 504, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7974

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 25, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D. 854 (American Bulb Co. v. Spiwak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Bulb Co. v. Spiwak, 251 A.D. 854, 298 N.Y.S. 504, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7974 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Order dated January 26, 1937, modified by striking out all the items mentioned in the first ordering paragraph except the item designated “ 2 motions to dismiss appeal; orders dated May 10, 1935, 40.00;” by striking out the words “ Two hundred eight and/100 ($208.80) dollars,” and by inserting in place thereof the words, “Forty ($40.00) dollars,” and by striking out the second ordering paragraph. As so modified the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellants. Order dated January 12, 1937, affirmed, without costs. The language of the decision of this court [248 App. Div. 753] in reversing the judgment in favor of the defendants and granting judgment in favor of the plaintiffs was clear and specific. Costs to the appellants in this court and in Special Term were decreed, and the judgment should so provide. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order dated January 26, 1937, modified by striking out all the items mentioned in the first ordering paragraph except the item designated “ 2 motions to dismiss appeal; orders dated May 10, 1935, 40.00;” by striking out the words “ Two hundred eight and/100 ($208.80) dollars,” and by inserting in place thereof the words, “Forty ($40.00) dollars,” and by striking out the second ordering paragraph. As so modified the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellants. Order dated January 12, 1937, affirmed, without costs. The language of the decision of this court [248 App. Div. 753] in reversing the judgment in favor of the defendants and granting judgment in favor of the plaintiffs was clear and specific. Costs to the appellants in this court and in Special Term were decreed, and the judgment should so provide. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D. 854, 298 N.Y.S. 504, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-bulb-co-v-spiwak-nyappdiv-1937.