American Bayard Cycle Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

American Bayard Cycle Co. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 1054, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1815

DecidedJune 26, 1968

DocketNo. P68/291; protests 300213-K, etc. (New York); No. P68/292; protest 58/456 (San Francisco); No. P68/293; protests 59/8756, etc. (Boston and New York); No. P68/294; protests 59/23449 and 59/29250 (Los Angeles); No. P68/295; protests 61/22451-12450 and 61/22892-12814 (Chicago); No. P68/296; protest 62/18408 (San Francisco)

StatusPublished

This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 1054 (American Bayard Cycle Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Bayard Cycle Co. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1054, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1815 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bicycles, with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Mangano Cycle Co. (47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bicycles, with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Mangano Cycle Co. (47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 Cust. Ct. 1054, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-bayard-cycle-co-v-united-states-cusc-1968.