American Bank v. Gray

Court of Appeals of Georgia

American Bank v. Gray

177 S.E.2d 208, 122 Ga. App. 443, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 895

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 14, 1970

Docket45472

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 177 S.E.2d 208 (American Bank v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Bank v. Gray, 177 S.E.2d 208, 122 Ga. App. 443, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 895 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Evans, Judge.

Whether this case be by "direct appeal or otherwise” (even though it is designated as a cross appeal to Gray v. American Bank of Atlanta, 121 Ga. App. 442, from the denial of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, the sole enumeration being on the denial of this judgment, it can only be reviewed by this court under Section 25 of the 1967 amendment to § 56 (h) of the Civil Practice Act (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 660; 1967, pp. 226, 238; Code Ann. § 81A-156(h)) wherein "the trial judge certifies that the order denying summary judgment . . . should be subject to review” by direct appeal. Section 1(b) of Ga. L. 1965, p. 18 (Code Ann. § 6-701(b)) is ineffective to give this court jurisdiction to review the case as an antecedent or ancillary ruling, since the amendment of 1968 (Ga. L. 1968, pp. [444]*4441072, 1073; Code Ann. §6-701, supra) expressly states a review of the order shall be governed by Section 56(h) as amended, supra. Hood v. General Shoe Corp., 119 Ga. App. 649 (168 SE2d 326); Skylark Enterprises v. Marsh & McLennan, 121 Ga. App. 235 (1) (173 SE2d 421). Since there is no certification in the record it cannot be reviewed, and it must be

Argued July 10, 1970 Decided September 14, 1970. Seay & Sims, Marshall R. Sims, for appellant. Smalley & Cogburn, Robert H. Smalley, Jr., for appellees.

Dismissed.

Hall, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans, Judge.

Whether this case be by "direct appeal or otherwise” (even though it is designated as a cross appeal to Gray v. American Bank of Atlanta, 121 Ga. App. 442, from the denial of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, the sole enumeration being on the denial of this judgment, it can only be reviewed by this court under Section 25 of the 1967 amendment to § 56 (h) of the Civil Practice Act (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 660; 1967, pp. 226, 238; Code Ann. § 81A-156(h)) wherein "the trial judge certifies that the order denying summary judgment . . . should be subject to review” by direct appeal. Section 1(b) of Ga. L. 1965, p. 18 (Code Ann. § 6-701(b)) is ineffective to give this court jurisdiction to review the case as an antecedent or ancillary ruling, since the amendment of 1968 (Ga. L. 1968, pp. [444]*4441072, 1073; Code Ann. §6-701, supra) expressly states a review of the order shall be governed by Section 56(h) as amended, supra. Hood v. General Shoe Corp., 119 Ga. App. 649 (168 SE2d 326); Skylark Enterprises v. Marsh & McLennan, 121 Ga. App. 235 (1) (173 SE2d 421). Since there is no certification in the record it cannot be reviewed, and it must be

Argued July 10, 1970 Decided September 14, 1970. Seay & Sims, Marshall R. Sims, for appellant. Smalley & Cogburn, Robert H. Smalley, Jr., for appellees.

Dismissed.

Hall, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 S.E.2d 208, 122 Ga. App. 443, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-bank-v-gray-gactapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack