American Bank & Trust Co. v. Lichtenstein
This text of 352 N.E.2d 132 (American Bank & Trust Co. v. Lichtenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum. Order affirmed on the memorandum opinion at the Appellate Division.
This action is predicated on the series of promissory notes and not on the theory of an account stated, and accordingly judgment may be entered under CPLR 3213 (contrast Interman Ind. Prods, v R. S. M. Electron Power, 37 NY2d 151). We do not consider the additional contentions presented by appellants for the first time in this court (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [rev ed], § 162, p 629 et seq.).
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
352 N.E.2d 132, 39 N.Y.2d 857, 386 N.Y.S.2d 215, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-bank-trust-co-v-lichtenstein-ny-1976.